Posts Tagged ‘IPAD’

Allie The Cat Loves iPads

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Allie the cat loves iPads. She loves going to bed listening to music on her iPad. She likes listening to Michael Jackson’s, “Lady in My Life” and “Human Nature”. She knows some of the words. During the day she is busy. She likes playing “App for Cats”, an iPad game for cats. Later in the day, she watches businesses news on CNBC and she likes to listen to business leaders like, Steve Jobs on the new iPad. What can I say, she is a very busy person.

AT&T Sells Out Of Multiple 4G iPad Models

Friday, March 9th, 2012

AT&T has already sold out of the new 4G iPad, reports BGR. Customers hoping to get the new iPad at the same time as its debut date will now have to wait until March 19th. However, at Verizon 4G iPads are still available to be delivered by the debut date, though BGR believes that will change soon as well. Apple’s new iPad starts at $499 and will be available to purchase in stores on March 16th.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff Has A Meltdown At iPad Launch

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

Salesforce (CRM) CEO Marc Benioff was at the new iPad launch. As he sat in the crowd he invite people to tweet him with questions.

I guess when Apple CEO Tim Cook, took the stage and failed to thank the Great Steve Jobs, Benioff had a melt down:

Tim Cook didn’t thank or remember Steve Jobs at iPad3 launch.There would be no iPad3 without Steve Jobs. Steve you were the best we had!

— Marc Benioff (@Benioff) March 7, 2012

Then he started taking shots at the Great company and its products:

Lame name of ipad3″The New iPad”.Where is the zen?Ipad3?Ipads?Ipad retina? Ipadx?

— Marc Benioff (@Benioff) March 7, 2012

Then it started going downhill:

The only racial and gender diversity in Apple’s keynotes is in the movies they show at the launches.#ipad3

— Marc Benioff (@Benioff) March 7, 2012

I guess he was missing the Great Steve Jobs. We all do. He was the greatest.

This #ipad3 launch is horribly boring.Steve, I miss you terribly. yfrog.com/oct1swvj

— Marc Benioff (@Benioff) March 7, 2012

Then Benioff continued with his tweets:

Apple: we have lots of white men building white #ipad3s. No women on stage at launch. Only racial diversity is in videos and photos shown.

— Marc Benioff (@Benioff) March 7, 2012

The iPad3 Could Have Hapnatic Touch

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

ipad 3 invite

The latest chatter is that just ahead of Apple’s (AAPL) iPad3 launch it that it will have Hapnatic touch.

What does that mean? It means when you touch the screen, you can feel the icon.

A company called Senseg was commissioned by Apple to bring a special kind of “textured” touchscreen technology to the iPad3. It uses haptic feedback to make the screen feel like a variety of different surfaces.

For example, if an app displays sand, the screen will feel rough. If it displays silk, it’ll feel smooth.

Senseg’s technology was on a display at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, and many were impressed.

Here is more detail on how Hapnatic touch works from Apple patent compiled by Macrumors.

Haptic Tactile Feedback

Perhaps most interesting amongst the patent applications is the acknowledgement by Apple that despite the many advantages of the iPhone’s multi-touch screen, a lack of tactile feedback remains its biggest disadvantage:

However, one of a touchscreen’s biggest advantages (i.e., the ability to utilize the same physical space for different functions) is also one of a touchscreen’s biggest disadvantages. When the user is unable to view the display (because the user is occupied with other tasks), the user can only feel the smooth hard surface of the touchscreen, regardless of the shape, size and location of the virtual buttons and/or other display elements. This makes it difficult for users to find icons, hyperlinks, textboxes or other user-selectable input elements that are being displayed, if any are even being displayed, without looking at the display.

Unless touch input components are improved, users that, for example, drive a motor vehicle, may avoid devices that have a touch input component and favor those that have a plurality of physical input components (e.g., buttons, wheels, etc.).

The proposed solution is the adoption of “haptic” display technologies which allow for some tactile feedback from touch screen displays. Apple proposes including a grid of piezoelectronic actuators that can be activated on command. By fluctuating the frequency of these actuators, the user will “feel” different surfaces as their finger moves across it. As an example, a display could include a virtual click wheel which vibrates at a different frequency as the center. Users could easily sense the difference and use the click wheel without having to look at it.

Haptic technology has started gaining adoption in other mobile phones and there had been some talk that Apple might have been looking to adopt it.

Fingerprint Identification as an Input Method

A second very intriguing patent application suggests the detection of a user’s individual fingerprints as an input method. Fingerprints have already been used in computers for security purposes, but Apple’s research involves the use of fingerprint patterns to actually identify distinct fingers. This could then be used to produce specific functions depending on which finger is being used. As shown in the table below, an index finger press might perform one action (PLAY/STOP) while a middle finger press could fast forward.

The reason for such a distinction again falls back on non-visual usage. Instead of requiring the user to find a button on the touchscreen, the use of different fingers alone could trigger different commands.

RFID Reader

Finally, the last notable application covers the dual use of a touch screen as an RFID reader. RFID tags are small circuits that can be embedded in objects for identification using a special reader. Apple suggests that the an RFID antenna can be placed in the touch sensor panel itself, allowing it to also be used as a RFID reader. As RFID tags become more prevalent, this could add a very useful function to future touch screen devices.

iPad3 Coming – Steps In The iPad Launch Cycle

Sunday, March 4th, 2012

Here are some behind the scenes pictures of the iPad3 pre launch, it includes production to launch preparations from various sites on the web including Micgadget and Macstories.

Putting the finishing touch at Yerba Buena for the iPad3 launch.

The iPad3 leaving the factory in China

The iPad3 being loaded on a plane possibly headed to the United States.

Comparing the iPad2 vs iPad3

iPad3 front view glass

iPad3 front view flat

iPad3 rear view

iPad2 vs iPad3 case comparison

iPad3 motherboard

iPad3 A5X chip

iPad3 production cleanroom

If Amazon’s Kindle Fire Is So Hot, Why Is It Still In Stock Everywhere? (AMZN, AAPL)

Monday, December 19th, 2011

kindle fire

CNN Tech journalist , reports that despite Amazon’s claim of selling 1 million Kindle Fire units per week the stores carrying them seem to be in-stock as opposed to sold-out.

He references a report by Daniel Ernst, an analyst at Hudson Square Research who was bewildered at the stock of Kindle Fires available in stores. Ernst penned a note to clients saying he took to retail stores in New York and Connecticut over the weekend, with only a handful of shopping days before Christmas — where he found “floor traffic up materially, but lines at checkout short.”

Demand for tablet computers was strong, he wrote, with Apple’s (AAPL) iPad maintaining its lead.

Amazon’s (AMZN) tablet sales, however, were a mystery:

“While Amazon reported that the Kindle family of devices was selling more than 1M units per week, we continue to be surprised that the Kindle Fire is still in-stock (as opposed to sold-out).”

Apple To Sell 190M iPhones & 81M iPads In 2012

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

Morgan Stanley, issued a report this morning saying it expects Apple to sell 190 million iPhones and 81 million iPads in 2012. The firm also predicts Q4 will see very strong iPhone sales based on a U.S. consumer survey. The firm claims the survey data implies Q4 U.S. iPhone shipments of 11M-12M units, and global shipments of 31M-36M units, above a Street consensus of 28M. The Firm maintains Overweight rating and $480 price target on Apple (AAPL) shares. Firm’s Bull case stands at $600.

All this is bad news for Intel which announced that its revenue will drop by $1 billion this quarter from $14.7 billion to $13.7 billion, as a result of the floods in Thailand.

The floods in Thailand may indeed be an issue but the shift to tablets and the cloud coupled with the fact that consumers are buying less PCs presents fundamental challenges for Intel going forward.

The Post PC Era: Signs Of Cracks At Intel

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

http://debexinc.com/150407_demolition_immeuble_begles18_1_.jpg

Intel took Wall Street by surprise yesterday when it announced that it was revising down its fourth quarter revenue estimates by $1 billion from $14.7 billion, to $13.7 billion.

The company said the shortfall was due a hard drive shortage that resulted from floods in Thailand. The floods disrupted various parts of the supply chain for computer manufacturers, including production of hard drives.

This is the second time that Intel has revised down its fourth quarter numbers. I think this is a far deeper problem than floods in Thailand. I believe it is a slow down due to customers moving to the cloud, buying less PCs and a shift towards tablet computing.

The very same thing that happen to the mobile industry is happening to the tech industry. The Apple iPhone was a game changer in the mobile industry. In the PC and tech industry the Apple iPad is the game changer. The shift to tablets is shaking the Wintel cartel. Many companies built thriving businesses around the inefficiencies of the Wintel cartel. You could argue much of Silicon Valley is built around those inefficiencies, and as Intel crumbles so will they and Silicon Valley will morph into something else as it did when the gold and oil rush ended.

It’s just a matter of time before we see layoffs at Intel and a slew of companies that were built around it will vanish, just like that. It happened in the mobile industry. Read about: iPad A Game-Changer. It’ll Do To Tech What The iPhone Did To Mobile

Kindle: A Tablet For Dummies

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Here is Captain Gadget’s review of the Amazon Kindle Fire. To summarize the, its a tablet for dummies.

(1) The French author Antoine de Saint Exupery once wrote that “Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed.” In taking on the iPad, Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablet certainly seems to be trying to achieve perfection by removal, not addition. The Fire has taken the iPad’s slate design and subtracted the cameras, the volume buttons, the physical home button, the microphone, the option for a larger hard drive or 3G connectivity, about 2.5 hours of battery life and three inches of display space. All of these subtractions apparently add up, economically, as Amazon has taken $300 off the price of the iPad, with one Kindle Fire selling for $199 versus $499 for the cheapest iPad 2. Another key removal is any possible barrier to entry for first-time tablet users: Amazon has created a home screen design that makes it the most intuitive and easy-to-use tablet for finding books, movies, music, newspapers and apps. The Kindle Fire is nowhere near perfect, but it is good enough, cheap enough and, most importantly, simple enough to operate, that for $200, a non-tech geek will be satisfied with this hassle-free, easy-to-use tablet.

(2) The Kindle Fire has a lot of obvious problems — the most glaring one is that the on-screen experience just isn’t as smooth as it is on other tablets. The display often lags by a click or two; the touchscreen is not always responsive when dealing with multimedia, especially streaming movies. The lack of external buttons on the tablet — no volume, no return, no home — is a strange, unfortunate choice for a tablet premised on simplicity and ease-of-use. (It took me a day to find the settings button, a small gear icon next to the battery indicator.) The battery life is mediocre at best, and for now the app store is comparatively barren. 8GB non-expandable storage will turn off those looking to locally store a collection of movies or music. Perhaps most disappointing is that, despite being much smaller than the iPad (see comparison photo here), the Kindle Fire tablet actually feels as though it weights more than its Apple counterpart, due to weight distribution, an odd, albeit subjectively judged, turn for a Kindle line that prides itself on lightness* [See note at bottom].
(3) But when it comes to downloading the content that Amazon sells — movies, music, books, newspapers and magazines — the Kindle Fire is so stupid-proof, so simple and intuitive, that the non-tech-savvy consumer who wants nothing more than a tablet for basic and easy media consumption will be pleasantly satisfied. The focus of Amazon’s tablet is not third-party apps or surfing websites, but rather buying things from Amazon.com to read, listen to and watch. No metaphors or cute names here: Across the top of your home screen are labels for “Newsstand,” “Books,” “Music” and “Video” (as well as “Docs,” “Apps” and “Web”), each of which delivers exactly what it says. If you want to buy a newspaper, you touch “Newsstand”; if you want to buy a book, you touch “Books”; if you want to rent a movie, you touch “Video.” It’s almost as though Amazon designed the thing for people who had never seen a tablet before but who knew, in their minds, what they wanted to do with one.
(4) The purchase process on the Kindle Fire, too, has been streamlined, as it comes pre-loaded with your Amazon account information so that you don’t have to enter any passwords or credit card information when you buy. Obviously this benefits Amazon with impulse-buy money, but it also benefits tablet shoppers who want the easiest and fastest possible way to get content onto their tablet. The Kindle Fire has most of the apps that a newbie tablet user would want — Angry Birds, Netflix and Cut the Rope, with more coming along as Fire sales explode — and getting them on the device is similarly simple. Easy, easy, easy is the mantra. The Kindle Fire offers the simplest, most basic tablet user experience there is right now.
(5) The Kindle Fire is not for everybody. Specs hounds, productivity seekers and road warriors looking for a business tablet will be disappointed in their own separate ways. Those who already use and are comfortable with their iPad will likely be disappointed by the relative clumsiness of the Kindle Fire, and those with more technological acumen should probably shell out more money for a more capable machine, one that has a higher learning curve but can do more. On the other hand, those who plan on using the Kindle Fire for little more than airplane reading, watching movies on the couch after work or playing Angry Birds on long car rides, will be content with the functionality, the price and the low barrier to entry of the Kindle Fire. It’s a tablet for dummies, which is a good thing: I don’t know why Amazon called its new Kindle the Fire, but perhaps it’s because that using one is as easy as lighting a match.

User Interface Wizard Slams Kindle Fire, Calls It ‘Disappointingly Poor’ (AMZN)

Tuesday, December 6th, 2011

Jakob Nielsen has been called “the king of usability,” and also “one of the world’s most influential designers“ by BusinessWeek.

He just slammed Amazon’s Kindle Fire in a new post that details just about everything wrong with the new tablet device.

We’ll break down some of Nielsen’s main points for you:

  • “Using designs intended for a full screen on a 7-inch tablet is like squeezing a size-10 person into a size-7 suit. Not going to look good. But that’s what the Fire is trying to do. Accessing full (desktop) sites on the Fire was a prescription for failure in our testing.”
  • “The Fire is a heavy object. It’s unpleasant to hold for extended periods of time. Unless you have forearm muscles like Popeye, you can’t comfortably sit and read an engaging novel all evening.”
  • “Screen updates are too slow, so scrolling can feel erratic and there’s a huge lag in response after pressing command-buttons. This breaks the illusion of direct manipulation. It’s odd that this happens; the Fire supposedly has a fast CPU and doesn’t push as many pixels as the iPad does.”
  • “Using apps and websites on the Kindle Fire is less efficient than on other devices because it lacks two key physical buttons: one to return to the home screen (as on the Kindle Keyboard) and one for volume up/down (as on the iPad).”

Check out the rest of Nielsen’s Kindle Fire rant here >